What concept did Huneeus introduce regarding domestic and international courts?

Huneeus introduced the concept of judicial defection, which pertains to the phenomenon where domestic courts choose not to apply or enforce international human rights norms and standards. This concept highlights instances where national judicial systems fail to comply with or actively resist the integration of international legal principles, leading to a 'defection' from the expected harmonization of domestic and international law.

Judicial defection can occur for various reasons, such as national sovereignty concerns, cultural perceptions of human rights, or differing interpretations of legal responsibilities. This concept serves to explain the tensions that can arise when international human rights obligations encounter domestic legal frameworks, offering insights into why some courts may prioritize national laws over international commitments. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for comprehending the broader context of international human rights enforcement and the interplay between domestic and international legal systems.