Which state responsibility framework is framed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights?

The framework framed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that is relevant to state responsibility primarily revolves around investigative reports and precautionary measures. This framework highlights the Commission's role in conducting investigations into human rights violations and making recommendations for remedial actions by the states involved.

Investigative reports serve as essential tools that can expose patterns of human rights abuses, inform public opinion, and provide the basis for legal and political accountability. Additionally, precautionary measures are urgent actions that the Commission can recommend to states to prevent further harm to individuals or groups at risk of human rights violations. This proactive approach underlines the Commission's commitment to protecting human rights and ensuring that states adhere to their obligations.

In contrast, the other frameworks mentioned focus on different aspects of human rights implementation and obligations. Structural discrimination involves systemic inequalities that need to be addressed but is not specifically within the framework provided by the Commission. Minimum core obligations relate to the fundamental responsibilities of states regarding economic, social, and cultural rights, but they are not exclusive to the Inter-American framework. Strict treaty interpretation focuses on how treaties should be interpreted in international law, which, while important, does not capture the unique mechanisms the Inter-American Commission employs for human rights oversight and state accountability.