Which statement accurately reflects a limitation of the UN Human Rights Committee's enforcement power?

The correct statement regarding a limitation of the UN Human Rights Committee's enforcement power is that there is no binding enforcement. The UN Human Rights Committee, which monitors the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, issues views and recommendations based on its examinations of state parties' compliance. However, these views are not legally binding, meaning that the Committee lacks the authority to compel states to adhere to its recommendations or findings. This is a critical aspect of its enforcement power, as it relies on states' voluntary compliance and political will rather than any mechanisms for coercion or enforcement.

In contrast, the other statements misrepresent the Committee's role or capacity. The assertion that all states comply with its views is inaccurate, as compliance varies significantly depending on political contexts. The claim that states cannot ignore its views does not hold true in practice, as states often may choose to disregard the Committee's recommendations without facing direct consequences. Finally, the idea that the Human Rights Committee possesses a police force is fundamentally incorrect, as it is an expert body without any law enforcement powers, making it incapable of taking direct actions to enforce human rights compliance.